Wednesday, 5 April 2017
Friday, 31 March 2017
Wednesday, 22 March 2017
No, journalists don’t twist things
Perceptions of
journalists are almost always negative — even if misguided.
It is easy
to perceive us as liars, chaotic, rude and lacking in consideration for others.
Outside of our professional practice, we are husbands, wives, fathers and mothers.
We have different
aspirations also. Some have chosen this path to serve the public while others
do so to win favours from those they cover. The later cannot be said to be
journalists. They are something else.
Do journalists
twist information? Some, yes. But others are purely professionals who chase the
truth wherever it is hidden. Our first obligation should be to the public. Our commitment
is to the truth.
We represent the
public and therefore we must be in touch with public opinion. We must be fully
aware and understand the aspirations of the people. When we ask questions of
government they do so on behalf of the people.
Journalists, like
any citizen operate within the law. We know that defaming people or lying about
events can land us in trouble. As we go about doing our work, we are also
mindful of balancing ethical and legal issues.
When ethical
issues emerge in our workplace or in our personal lives, we are often told to follow
our conscience. It is never easy to do so. Sound ethical thinking requires a
more analytical process of deliberation and discussion and should be based on a
foundation of well-considered values and principles.
There is a huge
difference between ethics and law. There are many examples when ethics can
clash with the law. For example, a judge can order a journalist to reveal the
source of his or her information but because of the promise you made with the
source, you will refuse to do so. In law you will have committed an offence but
ethically that is the right thing to do – never to betray your source.
The concepts of
the law and ethics are similar but differ in significant ways. Both are
concerned with governing conduct, with protecting rights, and with determining
what is right and what is wrong. They both operate in harmony but can come into
conflict as well. Broadly speaking the law tells us what we have the right to
do. Ethics helps us decide the right thing to do.
Most journalists
insist they have an ethical obligation to refuse to disclose the identity of
confidential sources. Unless they can honour these promises, they argue,
potential sources will refuse to speak to them in the future, and the public
will be denied important information.
One thing that
cannot be ignored is that, journalists are human beings. Like anybody else,
they have values and principles. It is these values which guides their conduct.
What we value as individuals also shapes the choice of topics or subjects to
write about or indeed our career path.
Some journalists
have chosen to use their profession to get to the top, to dine with kings
thereby betraying the public. How do you expect a person who drinks from the
same bowl with politicians to be objective? For we know that the drink loosens
the tongue and you start speaking the language of your master.
Photos: Newseum, Washington DC
Friday, 10 March 2017
No One Benefits If Women Are Held Back
The International Women’s Day came and went. I
have been seeing women in positions of power and influence and I thought we had
made great strides in achieving gender equality until I looked at the National
Assembly website.
Of the 166 Members of Parliament, only 30 or 18%
are women. Of the 29 full cabinet ministers only nine are women. They say
numbers don’t lie and for sure in this case we are still far from matching our
pronouncements with action. We still have very few women in key decision making positions,
especially elective ones.
Even in other fields, it is pretty much the
same. It has taken the country more than 50 years to produce the first female
fighter pilot. Thokozile
Muwamba loves aerobatics and her ambition is to become the first female air
force commander in the country. I am sure very few male folks will tolerate
this! As she noted in the interview the BBC, “the aircraft knows no sex”.
https://web.facebook.com/bbcafrica/videos/vb.285361880228/10155111104985229/?type=2&theater
Like Thokozile, over the past few decades, women
around the world have been pushing boundaries in educational achievement,
political representation, and economic participation—yet, gender gaps remain.
Unfortunately, most
women are still shunted in the kitchens and fields in the villages as men
continue to claim the lion’s share from the national cake. Are men smarter than
women to claim what they have? The answer is definitely no. I have seen
terrible men in society but I have also witnessed smart women.
Globally, just 55% of the women participate in the
labour force compared with 80 percent of men—and women are only now
earning what men did a decade ago. I am sure the statistic above does not take
into account the many other jobs that women perform.
As
countries around the world seek to grow their economies and reduce inequality,
tapping into the huge potential of women can be a game changer, says
IMF Director General Christine Lagarde. Recent analytical work—including that done at the IMF—clearly
demonstrates the compelling business case for women’s empowerment. Everyone has
a role to play—including governments, businesses, and international
institutions.
Recent research by the IMF shows increasing
women’s participation in the labor force can deliver significant macroeconomic
gains. For example, the research says, if Latin American countries raised
their female labor participation to the average of the Nordic countries (about
60 percent), GDP per capita could be up to 10 percent higher.
When the Rwandan delegation went to Beijing, China, in 1995 for
the landmark women’s conference, just a year after the genocide in their
country, the East African nation was cited as one of the worst violators of
women’s rights. Today, as the world marks 22 years since the Beijing
Declaration on gender equality, Rwanda leads other countries with women making
up more than 60% of parliamentarians.
In the words of Rwandan President Paul Kagame, “No one benefits if
women are held back. We have to change mindsets, not just the laws”. The trend
in Rwanda is positive. If it continues, the country may just meet the new 2030
deadline for gender equality in all sectors of the economy.
Rwanda has made great progress in promoting gender equality, largely
driven by strong Government commitment. Rwanda was second in the world
according to the 2009 Social Watch Gender Equity Index, with only Sweden having a higher score. Gender equality is
enshrined in the constitution and Rwanda was the first country in the world to
have more than 50% female members of Parliament.
Rwanda provides lessons for countries like Zambia. While Zambia has a ministry
of Gender, in Rwanda the government has gone further by by adding a gender monitoring
office, a commitment to gender-based budgeting, and in recent years there has
been a strong emphasis on fighting gender based violence. Women have the same
rights to inherit land as men. Girls are equally as likely to attend school as
boys and there is a Girls Education Policy and Implementation Plan in place.
However, a gender gap remains in public sector higher education,
particularly in science and engineering, but women are taking advantage of the
opportunities to study in private higher education institutions. Although the
majority of women, especially poor women in rural areas, have yet to benefit, the
gap between men and women employed in non-farm work is widening.
Going forward, it is clear that achieving gender equality will
require not just transforming economies to reduce inequalities, but also
getting countries to accelerate the implementation of commitments they made to
women 20 years ago.
Monday, 24 November 2014
Lessons from Mauritius
| Mary-Jan Dabot (right) talking to a Zambian entrepreneur |
In Zambian politics, the old generation are the ones fighting for a
future. What future when they have had their time in government and have had a
fair share of what life has on offer?
When you see them supporting a particular candidate, just
know they are not doing it out of principal or for a favour. They want to be paid in
return. This could be in the form of an appointment in government or in foreign
mission. Have you forgotten so soon that a certain Mr Solomon Mbuzi, a man who could
hardly walk or speak was appointed to be ambassador in a certain mission abroad
when the country has a number of energetic and qualified young people to do
that. All that Mr Mbuzi did was to shout the loudest that PF was the right part to form government.
While there is nothing wrong in the above actions, there
is everything wrong if all these old men and women are just interested in the benefits
that come with holding these offices. They must work and ensure that they bring innovation on board. The country is in dire need of selfless leaders
who would make very difficult decisions to break the ring of poverty strapped around the necks of more than 60% of our people. This country requires a
leader who will improve the lives of the majority and not just a few relatives
and party sympathissers. We need a leader who would be able to make a policy
shift that ensures that the private sector becomes key to job creation. Why
should we all clamour for a few jobs in government just because they offer force
security where you lazy around but continue getting your salary. This is not
health for a country that is serious with development.
Countries that have made progress have long realised that
it is not the duty of government to create jobs but to develop good policies
for social and economic development. The recent conversation I had with a
Mauritian government official was revealing and encouraging. He put it succinctly:
“Obviously, government does not create jobs, it is private business that
creates jobs, so we tell people, either you train yourself to become employed
by some enterprise or you create your own enterprise and employ others and this
vast campaign on entrepreneurship is supported by a number of measures.”
The measures which the government of Mauritius has put in
place for its business people include providing start-up capital and technical
support to budding entrepreneurs. Starters are coached to become efficient
entrepreneurs and given access to finances for their business. Banks ask you
for collateral and emerging entrepreneurs don’t have collateral. So, leasing
companies have been established that do not require collateral. Secondly, the
government also supports access to finance through negotiations with banks,
bringing them to support the working capital requirements of enterprises
through concessional loans. Through these kinds of loans the interest rates are
lower.
The business people produce and search for markets. They
also ensure that their products are competitive on the world market. Mr Amedee
Darga, the chairman of Enterprise Mauritius, says his government’s role is to support
the private sector to find new markets for exporting the products and services.
Thus it is not by accident that Mauritius currently exports
manufacturing goods of over 3,000 products to over 150 countries. The country
engaged in an aggressive economic diversification, first using the proceeds of
its once dominant sugar industry to build a strong manufacturing base, and then
broaden into service sectors such as tourism. Mauritius now has an average
annual growth rate of around 4% and manufacturing remains the spine of its
economy. Manufacturing has contributed over 122,000 jobs for a country with a
population of slightly over a million.
With correct people in government and
right policies, we can do the same by using proceeds from copper to grow other
sectors of the economy!
Thursday, 20 November 2014
The desire to lead
The list of those who have expressed their interest to
succeed late president Michael Sata has grown rather long. It stands at 10 as
of November 19th 2014. By the way, this number does not include
those in the opposition political parties who will battle it out with the ruling
party in next year’s presidential elections.
When you ask many of these candidates what their biggest
worries are, you will be astonished to find that it is rather things like how
to deal with having a big car, which relative to employ, which country to visit
and so on and so forth. These are rather little things that should not drive people's desire for the high office. The country's problems are rather too numerous to mention and they require selfless leaders if we are to overcome them.
Yes, we need a leader as soon as possible. But that leader should be someone who will help reduce the high poverty levels, put more children
in school, improve our healthcare system and create opportunities for all
Zambians and not just members of his party and relatives.
I don't have the answers to the current leadership conundrum but it lies each and everyone of us. Let us choose wisely and save the future of our children.
Friday, 3 October 2014
No one should die in search of a better life.
The death of 19-year-old, first year UNZA student,
Munsanka Makwambwa, who allegedly committed suicide by drinking doom – an insecticide,
makes sad reading. Why on earth should someone be driven to death because of
failure by those in authority to make right decisions. Bursaries are for poor
people like her and not sons and daughters of politicians and top civil
servants. I ask the leaders one question: where is your conscious on matters
such as this one?
Nelson Mandela showed us the better side of political
leadership and humanity which should continue to inspire us. He once said, education
is the great engine of personal development. “It is through education that the
daughter of a peasant can become a doctor, that a son of a mineworker can
become the head of the mine, that a child of farm workers can become the
president of a great nation. It is what we make out of what we have, not what
we are given, that separates one person from another."
What has led to the death of this young life is down to
corruption and misplaced priorities. You have continued to induce bye elections
and fund them but fail to fund education, health and other such sectors.
Corruption
is the silent killer which seems here to stay. In June this year at morning Masses in the Vatican, Pope Francis spoke
against corruption, reiterating his message against corrupt people in power
which he first gave at a morning Mass last March attended by 500 government
officials and incumbent and former lawmakers. As if he were addressing Zambian
officials and members of ruling class, Pope Francis warned the government
officials against abandoning the path of God’s love and liberating salvation
for the dead-end road of self-righteous corruption.
Pope Francis made his March 27
remarks at an early morning Mass at the Altar of the Chair in St. Peter’s
Basilica, some hours before US President Barack Obama paid him a courtesy call
at the Vatican.
The Pope used the readings to point
to “The ruling class—the doctors of the law, the Sadducees, the Pharisees”—who
“were closed up in their ideas, in their ministry, in their ideology.” These
leaders refused to heed the Word of God, he said, and even justified their
rejection of Jesus by claiming that he was “a prince of demons.”
The Pope said corruption in
politics, in business and even in the Church “hurts the poor who always pay the
price for the gain of the corrupt others.” Pope Francis noted that to the
corrupt, God has clearly said that He will bring disaster on them and their
families.
He said, corruption vexes God and
scandalises people because it exploits, enslaves, even kills the vulnerable
while those who commit this crime are focused solely on money and power.
The Pope said “The corrupt are
traitors who steal and kill, who exploit the innocent, but they do it at a
distance with gloves on so that they do not have to get their hands dirty.”
God curses these people, but he said
they can, just as Ahab did, repent. Ahab tore his garments and fasted and
humbled himself before the Lord. The corrupt must repent and make amends
for what they have done.
The Pope concluded by reminding the
faithful that our duty as Christians is to ask forgiveness from God for those
“people we read about in the papers” and “pray for their conversion of heart
and for the grace that we may never become corrupt ourselves.”
If you’re one of those corrupt officials
in the bursary committee, the Pope’s message speaks to your conscious. You must
feel guilty that you have contributed to the death of this young lady we read
about.
What we read in today’s Post
Newspaper about Finance Minister, Hon. Alexander Chikwanda concerning Chinese
nationals and their “love for corruption” should not be taken lightly. It is a
reflection of what goes on in many government institutions where rigid systems have
been put in place to perpetuate corruption. It is everywhere, in education, at
the pension fund, passport office, RTSA, police, in the judiciary – to mention a
few. What we need is serious action from those who govern us to get rid of
corruption and serve the lives of the majority poor.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





